It would be quite different with Pierre comes (preposition) moi, where the absence of a preposition opens the door to many solutions, because the meaning changes completely depending on whether the preposition to be used is at, with, behind, at, for or even without.
In short, choosing the right preposition is both a matter of meaning and a matter of usage. When it comes to meaning, the writer should make his choice based on that meaning. On the other hand, if it is a matter of usage, his logic does not help him. He is completely helpless.
As these works are rather rare and turn out to be incomplete, we have tried to fill this gap by presenting a repertoire, as complete as possible, in which this use is recorded and which answers the question: Is it to, from, to , by, for, on or with that I should use?
Colin, Jean-Paul. Dictionary of French difficulties, Paris, Les usuels du Robert, Dictionnaires Le Robert, 1994.
Quillet Dictionary of the French Language, 20 vols., Paris, Librairie Aristide Quillet, s. d.
Hanse, Joseph. New dictionary of modern French difficulties, 2nd edition, Paris – Louvain-la-Neuve, Duculot, 1987.
Lasserre, E. Is it to or from? Directory of verbs, adjectives and locutions building with a preposition, 14th edition, Lausanne, Payot, 1980.
Le Nouveau Petit Robert: alphabetical and analogue dictionary of the French language, Paris, Dictionnaires Le Robert, 1996.
Thomas, Adolphe V. Dictionary of the difficulties of the French language, Paris, Librairie Larousse, 1956.
The approach we have taken in compiling this directory is to be, within the limits of our skills, descriptive of current usage. But to claim that this is current usage already assumes a standard.
We borrowed this standard from works listed in the Sources Consulted section. There is not always unanimity among these sources, however. Here are a few examples.
In this case, we rallied to the majority and considered that the verb is constructed without preposition. We have therefore omitted from the repertoire the construction with the preposition of.
We therefore decided to include the preposition with in the repertoire, specifying that this is a contested use.
Faced with such a split of opinions, we opted for the inclusion of the two prepositions.
To simplify the consultation of the directory, we have chosen to present the data in four columns.
We saw in section 5 of The preposition that all categories of words, except tool words, can command a preposition. To go around the question, that is, to study the use of the preposition with all these categories, did not fit with our objective of producing a work of reasonable dimensions. So we have deliberately removed nouns – and pronouns – from our nomenclature, because they alone represent a whole world. We therefore limited ourselves to the other three categories: adjective, verb and adverb.
The choice of verbs included in the repertoire is based mainly on Sctrick’s book. Adjectives and adverbs are those that the reader encounters in any general language dictionary. Slang or limited use words were not used.
If a word – adjective, verb or adverb – formed with a prefix (examples: re- or in-) does not appear in the list, the reader is invited to consult the entry which corresponds to its stem.